Tuesday, August 28, 2012
I wrestled with taking a day off. I knew I needed one, but it was a perfect evening for riding or running. I finally convinced myself the rest was the best thing for me.
As you know, I’ve always been a big supporter of Lance Armstrong in his efforts to clear his name regarding performance enhancing drugs. Though he has never been tested positive for any banned substance, rumors continued to plague him as the different agencies looked into and then exhonerated him. The United States Anti-Doping Agency became his ‘straw’ and he finally stopped fighting. There is still no evidence, though USADA claims to have witnesses to testify against him. Basically, he’s telling them to shove it and do what they want to do. The following is his statement on the topic and I have reprinted it for those interested to see what he’s been going through.
Cyclist
Lance Armstrong released a statement on this evening announcing he would not
enter arbitration to fight doping charges brought against him by the U.S.
Anti-Doping Agency and its CEO, Travis Tygart. Here is Armstrong's statement:
There comes a point in every man's life
when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I
have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in
winning my seven Tours since 1999. Over the past three years, I have been
subjected to a two-year federal criminal investigation followed by Travis
Tygart's unconstitutional witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and
my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today - finished
with this nonsense. I had hoped that a federal court would stop USADA's
charade. Although the court was sympathetic to my concerns and recognized the
many improprieties and deficiencies in USADA's motives, its conduct, and its
process, the court ultimately decided that it could not intervene.
If I thought for one moment that by
participating in USADA's process, I could confront these allegations in a fair
setting and - once and for all - put these charges to rest, I would jump at the
chance. But I refuse to participate in a process that is so one-sided and
unfair. Regardless of what Travis Tygart says, there is zero physical evidence
to support his outlandish and heinous claims. The only physical evidence here
is the hundreds of controls I have passed with flying colors. I made myself
available around the clock and around the world. In-competition. Out of
competition. Blood. Urine. Whatever they asked for I provided. What is the
point of all this testing if, in the end, USADA will not stand by it?
From the beginning, however, this investigation
has not been about learning the truth or cleaning up cycling, but about
punishing me at all costs. I am a retired cyclist, yet USADA has lodged charges
over 17 years old despite its own 8-year limitation. As respected organizations
such as UCI and USA Cycling have made clear, USADA lacks jurisdiction even to
bring these charges. The international bodies governing cycling have ordered
USADA to stop, have given notice that no one should participate in USADA's
improper proceedings, and have made it clear the pronouncements by USADA that
it has banned people for life or stripped them of their accomplishments are
made without authority. And as many others, including USADA's own arbitrators,
have found, there is nothing even remotely fair about its process. USADA has
broken the law, turned its back on its own rules, and stiff-armed those who
have tried to persuade USADA to honor its obligations. At every turn, USADA has
played the role of a bully, threatening everyone in its way and challenging the
good faith of anyone who questions its motives or its methods, all at U.S.
taxpayers' expense. For the last two months, USADA has endlessly repeated the
mantra that there should be a single set of rules, applicable to all, but they
have arrogantly refused to practice what they preach. On top of all that, USADA
has allegedly made deals with other riders that circumvent their own rules as
long as they said I cheated. Many of those riders continue to race today.
The bottom line is I played by the rules
that were put in place by the UCI, WADA and USADA when I raced. The idea that
athletes can be convicted today without positive A and B samples, under the
same rules and procedures that apply to athletes with positive tests, perverts
the system and creates a process where any begrudged ex-teammate can open a
USADA case out of spite or for personal gain or a cheating cyclist can cut a
sweetheart deal for themselves. It's an unfair approach, applied selectively,
in opposition to all the rules. It's just not right.